Comments on: Hebbs.no with hidden H1-flooding http://seospamcops.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/hebbsno-with-hidden-h1-flooding/ We fight SEO SPAM and target SEO SPAMMERS Thu, 15 May 2008 15:03:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU By: Christian Johansen http://seospamcops.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/hebbsno-with-hidden-h1-flooding/#comment-147 Christian Johansen Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:08:30 +0000 http://seospamcops.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/hebbsno-with-hidden-h1-flooding/#comment-147 Bjørn: you are right. There is no such thing as z-index overflowing. The spec says that z-index takes as value an integer, no further limitations: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visuren.html#z-index In fact, z-index: 1000; or some other very high number is a common trick to be DAMN SURE that an element displays on top. Why hebbs.no would want to use it on content they are hiding I don't know. Bjørn: you are right. There is no such thing as z-index overflowing. The spec says that z-index takes as value an integer, no further limitations: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visuren.html#z-index

In fact, z-index: 1000; or some other very high number is a common trick to be DAMN SURE that an element displays on top. Why hebbs.no would want to use it on content they are hiding I don’t know.

]]> By: Bjørn Johansen http://seospamcops.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/hebbsno-with-hidden-h1-flooding/#comment-137 Bjørn Johansen Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:04:13 +0000 http://seospamcops.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/hebbsno-with-hidden-h1-flooding/#comment-137 z-index is actually not tabbing index, but the visual stack level (enables things to be positioned on top of each other and overlapping), and AFAIK is not out of range with 999 (even though I've never tried using this amount of levels). z-index is actually not tabbing index, but the visual stack level (enables things to be positioned on top of each other and overlapping), and AFAIK is not out of range with 999 (even though I’ve never tried using this amount of levels).

]]>